May. 26th, 2023

thewayne: (Default)
Long Covid is closer to being considered an umbrella descriptor to what may be described as any of several different types of causes: autoimmunity, immune system dysregulation, organ injury, viral persistence, and intestinal microbiome imbalances (dysbiosis). A study recently published in JAMA, the Journal of the American Medical Association, of 9,700 patients, applies weighting to take that list of 200 common symptoms down to twelve.

From the article: "They came to a core list of 12 symptoms and assigned each symptom a score that represented the odds of it being related to COVID-19. The scores for each of the 12 symptoms ranged from 1 to 8, and the researchers added up the symptom points for each person in the trial. Based on the spectrum of score totals seen among uninfected people, the researchers concluded that a score of 12 was a reasonable cutoff for determining if someone had long COVID. And that cutoff was validated when they looked at how it correlated with the participants' reports of quality of life and health."

They are:
Symptoms Score
Loss of smell or taste 8
Post-exertional malaise (feeling tired after minor physical or mental activity) 7
Chronic cough 4
Brain fog 3
Thirst 3
Palpitations 2
Chest pain 2
Fatigue 1
Changes in sexual desire or capacity 1
Dizziness 1
Gastrointestinal symptoms 1
Abnormal movements 1
Hair loss 1


https://arstechnica.com/health/2023/05/long-covid-is-still-a-puzzle-but-scientists-identify-12-core-symptoms/
thewayne: (Default)
A Tesla insider sent 23,000 files and documents - over 100 GIG of data - to the German news org Handelsblatt. It details (to put it mildly) numerous customer complaints about the full self-driving/Auto Pilot, information on current and former employees, and dates back to 2015. More than 2,400 complaints about sudden and unintended acceleration, 1,500+ complaints about braking.

Handelsblatt went to the trouble of contacting people directly to confirm their complaints. And Tesla had a policy in place of never replying in writing or on voice mail, all responses had to be verbal to the customer so nothing was in print in the event of litigation.

Here's a comment to the Ars article that's a both telling and scary: "Some years ago I interviewed for a position as engineering lead for systems test, and I was fortunate enough to have an interview slot with the outgoing lead.

After going through his questions, I asked him one question - How does the engineering culture here treat testing reports?

He started his reply defensively, with "it's improving." But then outlined a culture where reports that indicated engineering flaws, or issues were routinely rejected, where test engineers were frequently pressured to adjust tests to avoid failures - not because the tests were wrong, or the failures not legitimate, but because the failure might hold up the product release cycle. A culture where test engineers were seen as lesser quality, or just technicians, because "real engineers design things, test engineers just try to screw things up."

I turned down the position.

An engineering culture that sidelines failure reports, that marginalizes the bugs and problems, that doesn't see fixing issues as a win for the product, for the engineering teams, and the company - that culture will build problematic products. This article is hardly news to anyone who's looked with a critical eye at the undercurrent of problem reports around Tesla, but it seems to be a lot of hard evidence that the company has a culture that doesn't take product quality seriously enough."


One of my best friends lives in Scottsdale. Down the street was a Tesla that was damaged in an accident. It sat for 6+ months, unrepaired, because of problems getting replacement body panels. Apparently the insurance company finally junked the car and soon there was an Audi eTron sitting in the drive and the Tesla was gone.

https://arstechnica.com/cars/2023/05/massive-trove-of-tesla-files-contains-thousands-of-safety-complaints/
thewayne: (Default)
An organization called EPEAT, the Electronic Product Environmental Assessment Tool registry, is wanting their label removed from lots of HP models that feature Dynamic Security that won't allow users to use non-HP ink in them. The EPEAT standard is for equipment that "... are built with the environment in mind and, more specifically, do not block third-party ink cartridges", something that Dynamic Security, blocking third-party cartridges that promote reduced plastic consumption and landfill use, prevents. EPEAT says Dynamic Security makes a mockery of this endorsement and thus the labels should no longer be applied to printers that have it installed.

Additionally, HP is gaming the system. From the complaint: "OfficeJet 9015e claims 'EPEAT Silver'; however, the corresponding EPEAT Registry describes the registered device as 'HP OfficeJet Pro 9010/9012/9015/9018 All-in-One Printer.' This pattern is repeated across numerous HP devices, many of which are HP+ models that include the letter ā€œeā€ at the end of their model number. While none of these 'e' models specifically appear in the EPEAT registry, as shown in the table below HP claims EPEAT registration for about half of them.
Advertisement

The trade group added that the Envy Inspire 7255e and OfficeJet 8034e claim EPEAT registration, but there are no such models registered, even if you get rid of the "e" suffix.

"This blatant greenwashing must be corrected."


https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2023/05/hp-printers-should-have-epeat-ecolabels-revoked-trade-group-demands/

May 2025

S M T W T F S
    1 23
45678910
1112 131415 1617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated May. 19th, 2025 01:19 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios
OSZAR »