thewayne: (Default)
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

You didn't actually believe them, did you? After all, most of Big G's revenue is derived from selling advertising.

Well, today Google said that they are formally NOT going to follow through on their promise to block third-party cookies in their browser.

I AM SHOCKED, SHOCKED I SAY!

No, not really.

There's a reason why I don't use their browser, and not trusting Google at their word is one of them.

https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2024/07/google-will-not-disable-tracking-cookies-in-chrome-after-years-of-trying/

https://tech.slashdot.org/story/24/07/22/2055228/google-wont-be-deprecating-third-party-cookies-in-chrome-after-all
thewayne: (Default)
In 2018, Google started using something called Firebase Dynamic Links to replace Google URL Shortener. Theoretically, August 2025, the old goo.gl system will be shut down and any references to it will start returning 404 errors.

Google has a history of pushing back shutdown dates, so that date might not be firm, very hard to say. Regardless, if you used goo.gl a lot on web pages, you might want to start reviewing them and seeing what other services can be used, or convert them back to full, native links.

https://developers.googleblog.com/en/google-url-shortener-links-will-no-longer-be-available/

https://news.slashdot.org/story/24/07/18/216211/google-url-shortener-links-will-return-a-404-response
thewayne: (Default)
Google bought Fitbit in 2021, and has been progressively trying to make things worse for those users. In their latest move, they're shutting down the web portal next month, making the only access to massive amounts of data through their app. And a phone app at that. No larger devices, like tablets. Just a phone app.

Remember Google, the company who announced their corporate motto is "Don't be evil"?

Garmin and Apple both offer tablet apps for their watches.

https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2024/06/googles-abuse-of-fitbit-continues-with-web-app-shutdown/

https://tech.slashdot.org/story/24/06/12/1939226/googles-abuse-of-fitbit-continues-with-web-app-shutdown
thewayne: (Default)
Well, that didn't take long! The guy who discovered the tiny little clause in G's terms and conditions posted a video. When a Google spokesdrone was asked about it, they replied "If a customer sends their Pixel to Google for repair, we would not keep it regardless of whether it has non-OEM parts or not. In certain situations, we won't be able to complete a repair if there are safety concerns. In that case, we will either send it back to the customer or work with them to determine next steps. Customers are also free to seek the repair options that work best for them. We are updating our Terms and Conditions to clarify this."

Just a bit more reasonable!

The truth is, none of the phone makers really want you repairing your phones. If they had their way, the phones would be epoxied closed with no screws, and any attempt to open them would irrevocably destroy the innards and you'd have to buy a new one. But we don't want to spend big bucks for new batteries or displays. But the reality is that Google wants you to pay upwards of $300 for a new screen for a Pixel 6 when the same amount of money will get you a used one in pretty good shape from EBay.

Personally, with one exception, I've never had a problem with used or refurbished gear that I've purchased. I know which way I'd go.

Now, will Samsung change their ways?

https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2024/06/google-changes-repair-policy-after-criticism-of-third-party-parts-ban/
thewayne: (Default)
If you send your phone in to Google, THEY CAN FLAT-OUT KEEP YOUR PHONE FOR NON-OEM PARTS!

From the article, "As YouTuber Louis Rossmann discovered, Google’s service and repair terms and conditions contain a concerning stipulation. The document states that Google will keep your device if a non-OEM part is found. You can see the excerpt below." (excerpt in the linked article)

The terms and conditions went into effect last July.

So, in the Samsung case, the repair shops are being ordered to destroy your personal property. In this Google case, it's theft. There's something called First Sale Principle, in that if you buy something, you own it - it is your property and you can do whatever you want with it. Both Google and Samsung are clearly violating this. There's going to be some serious class action law suits over this if anyone's property is stolen or destroyed following these rules.

As one Slashdot commenter said, it would be akin to taking your car into a dealership and they refusing to return it because you had a brake job done at Pep Boys or some place.

https://www.androidauthority.com/google-keeps-phones-with-non-oem-parts-3448350/

https://mobile.slashdot.org/story/24/06/03/2025211/google-can-keep-your-phone-if-you-send-it-in-for-repair-with-non-oem-parts
thewayne: (Default)
Google's extensions system is known as Manifest, and it's currently at V2. V3 launches next week, and it's going to break a lot, if not all, of V2. Ad blockers, etc.

They announced V3 in 2019 and it's been oft delayed, but will now be launched. And lots of controversy is following it, particularly with ad blockers and content filtering. Keep in mind that Google is - first and always - a company built around serving ads.

From the article: "A big source of skepticism around Manifest V3 is limitations around "content filtering," aka the APIs ad blockers and anti-tracking extensions use to fight ad companies like Google. Google, which makes about 77 percent of its revenue from advertising, has not published a serious explanation as to why Manifest V3 limits content filtering, and it's not clear how that aligns with the goals of "improving the security, privacy, performance and trustworthiness." Like Kewisch said, the primary goal of malicious extensions is to spy on users and slurp up data, which has nothing to do with content filtering. This is all happening while Google is building an ad system directly into Chrome, and Google properties like YouTube are making aggressive moves against ad blockers." (emphasis mine)

It's not easy to not use Google, I use their email as mostly receive-only (newsletters mainly) and their search engine, and that's about it. As bad as it's become through it getting gamed, it's still pretty good.

https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2024/05/google-starts-deprecating-older-more-capable-chrome-extensions-next-week/
thewayne: (Default)
In a truly "unprecedented" event, Google *POOF*ed the cloud-hosted data for "UniSuper, an Australian pension fund that manages $135 billion worth of funds and has 647,000 members". ALL DATA. GONE.

Now, lest we think that UniSuper wimped out on their infrastructure design with their Google cloud hosting, they didn't. They paid for their hosting to be properly backed up and to be geographically diversified.

And somehow Google managed to wipe out all of it. Data: gone. Backups: gone.

The details of how Google threw all of this into the bit bucket is unknown.

The saving grace is that UniSuper was smart to diversify their cloud hosting and also hosted with a second provider, and were able to reestablish their infrastructure through recovering from their second hosting provider. However, it cost them two weeks of downtime, plus incremental restoration and account transaction processing. So not only was their IT team stressed beyond belief, but their customer service team were constantly having to tell people what was going on and having to answer why account balances were not correct.

This is supposed to be utterly impossible, they were also quite emphatic that this was not a hacking event. Additionally, most systems should be doing what's known as 'soft deletes' where if something is deleted, it just appears to have gone away and is invisible to the outside world but is still recoverable. Apparently this was all gone gone. Thus far no other cloud services provider is crowing that this won't happen if you switch to us, because clearly no one thought it could happen at Google until it did.

Google is quite sincere about saying 'steps being put in place to prevent this from happening again', what about explaining in somewhat abstracted terms what allowed it to happen in the first place? That would make the IT administrators in the world a lot happier!

https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2024/05/google-cloud-accidentally-nukes-customer-account-causes-two-weeks-of-downtime/
thewayne: (Default)
The problem is that on Google forums, Google has locked the threads where people are questioning whether or not the fix works! If you can't discuss it with other people outside of the Google hive mind, how do you know whether it actually works in the wild?

One solution involves a previously unknown hidden menu in the Google desktop app. And initial feedback, before the forums were locked, were not encouraging. Another suggested recover path involved command line invocations, again, not many people reporting success.

And Google has locked the message forums for this. Are they washing their hands of the problem? Which kind of implies they know they have a catastrophic loss problem, meaning no way to recover people's data? This could lead to lawsuits as Google Drive is also sold as a commercial product that businesses rely upon, and it could literally destroy a business if its data is lost!

https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2023/12/google-calls-drive-data-loss-fixed-locks-forum-threads-saying-otherwise/
thewayne: (Default)
Put everything in the cloud, what could possibly go wrong?! Well, how about six months of information suddenly going missing?

Google is advising customers to DO NOTHING to try to get your data back, let their engineers investigate the situation and find a solution.

Stuff like this happens, most likely a configuration change went live and had unforeseen repercussions.

I will once again remind people that all the cloud is is Someone Else's Servers On The Other Side Of The Internet. This is what the internet has been FOREVER, it's just marketing buzz, a convenient label.

I should dig up and post an article about a large company that decided to re-home servers FROM the cloud. That is, to buy big, beefy servers and run them themselves to save cloud hosting charges. They estimated it would save them, IIRC, over a million dollars a year. And they recovered that amount of money in about 3 or 4 months.

I personally would be reluctant to run my business through the cloud if it were of any size, there are too many risks including a backhoe eating your internet connection shutting your business down for a few days.

https://www.theregister.com/2023/11/27/google_drive_files_disappearing/

https://it.slashdot.org/story/23/11/27/1333218/google-drive-misplaces-months-worth-of-customer-files
thewayne: (Default)
No, that's not the phrase. What is it? NOT. A good reason NOT to buy Google's Pixel Watch.

The reason? THEY CANNOT BE REPAIRED. There is no repair parts channel. If you bust the glass crystal, and the entire front of the watch is a single piece, you're screwed. No replacement is possible, toss it. It is ewaste. Replace it.

And are you likely to buy another Google-branded product to replace it with? Methinks not.

Google just announced that they're going to provide replacement parts for their tablets to iFixit, which is terrific. Apparently the watch channel isn't going to get the same treatment.

https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2023/09/11-months-after-launch-googles-pixel-watch-still-has-no-path-to-repair/


I had to have my Apple Watch replaced under warranty, the ECG sensor failed. Conveniently I was in Phoenix at the time: I took it to a UPS Store, provided them the RMA number, and a few days later a new one was at my home. No charge to me.
thewayne: (Default)
I've never liked the Chrome browser, personally, for two reasons. It had an auto-update that at the time that I learned about it you couldn't disable, and it eats an awful lot of resources. And I don't use it except on a couple of PCs at work, not on my personal work station.

So let me give you a little background on how cookies can track you across web sites.

First off, don't go thinking that Google is mainly a search engine company. They are an advertising company. They make their money off of selling (functionally) ad space to companies through search results and looking at key words in your email. NEVER FORGET THIS. It used to be this was accomplished by what is known as third-party cookies. This was a special kind of cookie that could persist across web sites and browser sessions.

For example, you buy a pair of shoes off of Amazon. Amazon keeps a cookie (or three) in your browser's cookie cache that remembers some information about you, and theoretically no one except Amazon can read that information. So we have an Amazon.com cookie. Now, a super cookie is just a cookie with the name .Com and that's it. And because it's a top-level domain (TLD), apparently it can read some information below it, such as the Amazon.com cookie. It may not know what the information within the Amazon.com cookies means, but it knows the information is there and might be able to make some guesses.

Advertisers want as much information about people as they can get, supercookies are one such tool. Another tool is tracking pixels. These are invisible 1 pixel images that are inserted into a page or email that link to a server where the tracking pixel has a specific identity tied to the email or page that you open. If your email or web page doesn't block images or tracking pixels, when you open the page, that pixel is loaded - and the tracker database knows that specific pixel was loaded and ties that page or your email into tracking information about you.

Now, email programs can be configured to block tracking pixels and supercookies, which advertisers hate because they get less analytic information which means less information they can sell to potential ad or analytics buyers. And remember, Google is in the ad serving business.

Google came up with an alternative, baked into the browser that they want everyone to use. When you open Gmail, or Google Search, in Firefox or Microsoft Edge or Safari, you get this lovely popup: For the best experience, open this page in Google Chrome. Gee, wonder why! Now what Google is doing is they analyze the page that your browser is now looking at and generates a 'topic list', along with a unique identifier for your PC, and now they have analytics that they can sell for ad buyers! All without cookies! Oh, and it gets better! Google claims "a significant step on the path towards a fundamentally more private web."

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

They also claim that they'll block third-party cookies in the second half of 2024. I think Firefox now does that by default. And while Microsoft Edge, which is a pretty good browser, is built on Chrome code, it can also block third-party cookies.

https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2023/09/googles-widely-opposed-ad-platform-the-privacy-sandbox-launches-in-chrome/
thewayne: (Default)
The RNC filed a lawsuit against Google for Gmail sending RNC fundraising mail addressed to Gmail users directly to spam folders, saying that they had an anti-conservative bias. Of seven claims they made, the judge thoroughly squashed five of them, and is letting the RNC amend two. However, the basic underpinnings of the two claims were knocked away and they'll have to be significantly readdressed to be refiled.

Here is perhaps my favorite utterance from the judge. The RNC claimed that Google committed fraud, I guess for failing to deliver the solicitation mail to the mailing list inboxes? The judge said: "The RNC lacks standing to bring the fraud claim because it is not a Gmail user, ... The RNC uses Salesforce and a separate email-delivery platform called Everest."

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

Plus, Gmail is a free service! How could Google defraud me if I'm not a business-class customer paying for it? Yes, they do have a business tier.

Why do I have a sneaking suspicion that Google might buy a business-class subscription and start spraying their Google email address base direct that way?

Oh, and here's another beauty of a quote: Google previously ran a pilot program that let political emails bypass the Gmail spam filter. Google said in a January 2023 court filing that "the RNC has chosen not to participate in Google's FEC-approved Pilot Program."

And here's a comment for the article from a mail server administrator: "Speaking as a mailserver admin: more GOP fundraiser emails wind up in the spamtrap because the GOP uses more spammer tactics, more aggressively. I've seen everything from spoofed to and from lines to entire messages in the subject line to white text on white background to bayes poison to substituting letters for numbers to try to evade money-related spam filters to you name it.

A brand new install of spamassassin with default filters only will also block far more Republican fundraiser emails than DNC ones, for exactly this reason... And the disparity only gets worse if you let it train its Bayes filter (which, quick reminder, the GOP sometimes attempts to poison)."


https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2023/08/judge-tears-apart-republican-lawsuit-alleging-bias-in-gmail-spam-filter/
thewayne: (Default)
Over the weekend Google updated their Terms of Service to say that they'll scrape everything they can see online and use it to train their AI systems.

From the article: "...the company reserves the right to scrape just about everything you post online to build its AI tools. If Google can read your words, assume they belong to the company now, and expect that they’re nesting somewhere in the bowels of a chatbot."

Now, there's something very important here. Google is not talking about words that you've posted on Google servers, like Gmail or Spaces or whatever. They're talking the ENTIRE World Wide Web. Facebook. Restaurant reviews. Blogs. Etc. ANYTHING AND EVERYTHING.

And it wouldn't surprise me in the least if they ignored robots.txt block lists. Odds are the only thing that'd keep them out is passworded areas, and they know some ways around those.

Remember when Google announced that their corporate motto was "Don't be evil"? How I laughed at that! Didn't people realize that it was a hipster ironic statement? There was an unprinted subtext that followed: "... as long as it doesn't get in the way of us making a bazillion dollars and ruling the universe."

https://gizmodo.com/google-says-itll-scrape-everything-you-post-online-for-1850601486
thewayne: (Default)
Whatever platform, if it hasn't been signed in to or used in two years, starting in December that account may go away. After concerns being raised about YouTube videos vanishing from deceased users, there has been an accommodation found, though I don't know what it is off-hand.

From the article: "The company said that if a Google account had not been used or signed into for at least two years, it might delete the account and content across Google Workspace, which includes Gmail, Docs, Drive, Meet and Calendar, as well as YouTube and Google Photos.

The policy change only applies to personal Google Accounts and not to those for organizations like schools or businesses.

In 2020, Google had said it would remove content stored in an inactive account, but not delete the account itself."


I didn't see the 2020 announcement. In related newts, the Muskbrat said that Twitter was going to start archiving old unused accounts.

I'm curious how many accounts they expect to go away. This is simply good system maintenance, I'm a little surprised it's taken them this long to get around to it. I think part of it is with the financial crunch hitting tech companies, they're trying to avoid data center expansion by freeing up space to buy themselves some time for the economy to improve.

https://www.reuters.com/technology/google-delete-inactive-accounts-starting-december-2023-05-16/
thewayne: (Default)
There's been a big rise in bogus ads being put into Google searches that result in malware being downloaded.

If you need a copy of Adobe Acrobat Reader or other software, go directly to the vendor's site. If you're not sure, you can search for the proper maker easily enough.

Hopefully Google will soon tighten up their ad inspection and this problem will subside.

https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2023/02/until-further-notice-think-twice-before-using-google-to-download-software/
thewayne: (Default)
Google is pretty much under constant anti-monopoly investigation, and they hide communications by training their people to CC all of their emails to the company's attorneys! Regardless of whether or not the email is in the least bit significant or needs legal consultation, they do this and if a subpoena comes along, Google then claims attorney/client privilege. This absolutely flies in the face of the fact that this action completely does not establish attorney/client privilege. They have even been previously cautioned on it, and continue doing it! The attorneys mostly ignore the emails and never respond, probably don't even look at them unless they're from certain managers - think of the time and charges involved if they looked at this flood!

Remember Google's alleged motto a few years ago? "Don't be evil". I laughed at it then, I laughed at it now.

While I do use their search engine, Maps, and Gmail, I don't use Gmail for anything resembling private communications. It's throw-away stuff and mailing list collectors.

https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2022/03/google-routinely-hides-emails-from-litigation-by-ccing-attorneys-doj-alleges/
thewayne: (Default)
This is an amazing thing, and they've been doing it for a decade! A German entrepreneur created a search engine that, for approximately every 45 searches on its site, they plant a tree! They've built renewable power plants. They have a branch of the company (heh, heh) that monitors satellite imagery of the areas they've planted to make sure things are going well.

The company is Ecosia, and their web site has a running counter of how many trees that they've planted. The first eco-search engine that he tried to set up was in partnership with Google, but that quickly ended. This engine's results are back-ended with Bing. I'm not sure what I think of that, I just switched my iMac's Firefox browser to it, so I'll be seeing. I'm running three browsers on my iMac, so I'll be switching my Safari browser to it later, then I'll have to reconfig my laptops (yes, I have two: a MacBook Pro and an Asus running Windows 10), and then I'll have to consider my two iPads and my iPhone. THEN I'll have to think about my work computer....

Oh: if you create an account on their system, it'll show how many trees that your searches are responsible for planting! I do a lot of searches at the library, I expect I could be good for a tree a week maybe!

https://www.ecosia.org

https://www.spiegel.de/international/business/ecosia-start-up-aims-to-use-your-search-results-to-plant-trees-a-1278617.html

By the way, if you have an Apple device, and perhaps Android, you can subscribe to Der Spiegel's international edition for $1 a month on a six-month subscription! Lots of good stuff.


Speaking of trees, a recent study shows that living surrounded by leafy trees is much better for your wellness. I need to read the article as the forest that I live in is mainly pines. I could clear some and plant some leafy things that might be hearty enough to survive up here, but I don't know how long they'd take to be beneficial.

https://www.citylab.com/environment/2019/07/urban-tree-canopy-green-space-wellbeing-research/595060/
thewayne: (Cyranose)
The good news is that a non-technical jury found that Google's use of Java to create Android was not infringing. Oracle has been suing Google over this for years and the jury came back after three days of deliberation and said Google was OK with what they did. Considering that Sun, who was bought out by Oracle, also thought it was OK even though Sun didn't like it, probably was a key factor.

Revealed in the testimony was that Oracle tried to develop their own phone using Java and couldn't.

I'm not a huge fan of Google. Yes, their products are pretty good, and I use their search engine, maps, and Gmail regularly. It's their original 'Don't be evil' mantra that bugs me because they monetize everything. Now, a business has to make money to survive in business, but why couldn't they be more upfront about it?

The basic standard is that if you're not paying for a service, then YOU (and your information) is the product being sold.

Oracle is, of course, going to appeal the verdict. Had Google lost, it is rumored that they could ask for as much as $9 BILLION dollars, insert your best Dr. Evil voice as needed.

http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2016/05/google-wins-trial-against-oracle-as-jury-finds-android-is-fair-use/


The bad news concerns Apple. Amongst the many lawsuits against it at any given time was one from VirnetX that claimed that Apple was infringing against its patents with its Facetime and iMessage apps. Yesterday they lost the case. VirnetX is a patent troll: they buy lots of patents, wait for a product that is vaguely similar to be successful the go crying to the East Texas courts. VirnetX claims that Apple has done irreparable harm to its brand, even though they've never produced a product and no one has heard of them outside of the patent troll game.

So Apple may have to cough up a heck of a lot of money, or possibly turn off iMessages and Facetime, which would suck in a major way and probably FINALLY! get the attention of Congress and the need for patent reform.

Me, personally, I don't use Facetime but I can appreciate the product. I use iMessages regularly, and I love the fact that my texts, which are all so sexy and top secret, are very strongly encrypted and my cell carrier can't see them since they're shunted through Apple's servers. So I would hate to see them go.

Apple is, naturally, going to appeal the decision.

http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2016/05/patent-troll-that-beat-apple-now-wants-judge-to-block-facetime-imessages/

However....

Apple just hired the co-founder of Silent Circle, Blackphone, and PGP Corp. Jon Callas is an expert when it comes to encrypted communications, so presumably he's going to beef-up Apple crypto and possibly revamp iMessages and Facetime so they're even more secure and perhaps no longer infringe on VirnetX's patents.

http://www.reuters.com/article/us-apple-encryption-callas-idUSKCN0YF2J1
thewayne: (Cyranose)
It's interesting. We're used to being presented with a Captcha box with squiggly letters that supposedly only humans can decifer (which software could in some circumstances), now Google will be presenting us with a checkbox that says 'I am not a robot.'

The little square that the text and box are in is monitored, and Google says that the characteristic of a person checking that box is unique and identifiable. I just wonder how long it will take spammers to figure out how to make the mouse pointer jiggle a little bit before checking the box. I also wonder how this will work with assistive devices for people who don't use conventional pointing devices.

http://www.wired.com/2014/12/google-one-click-recaptcha/
thewayne: (Cyranose)
The text Lorem Ipsum is faux Latin taken from a passage by Cicero, it was most commonly used as a placeholder in texts or web pages to check layout before actual content was available. It doesn't mean anything, it's mangled Latin.

However....

A researcher noticed that while typing Lorem in to Google Translate that it translated as 'China', further research with other words from the Lorem Ipsum block showed other peculiarities, almost as if people were using Google Translate to send secret messages. Sadly, Google Translate underwent an update that stopped these interesting translations, however, people have since found that some words from the faux text do still produce interesting results.

Coincidence, or not? We'll probably never know. I wonder if Krebs or others have filed FOIA requests with the CIA/NSA for documents related to Google Translate? Could be interesting.

http://krebsonsecurity.com/2014/08/lorem-ipsum-of-good-evil-google-china/

May 2025

S M T W T F S
    1 23
45678910
1112 131415 1617
18 19 20 212223 24
25262728293031

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated May. 25th, 2025 05:24 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios
OSZAR »