thewayne: (Default)
In the ultimate own-goal, a recent HP "security update" has bricked models LaserJet MFP M232-M237, preventing them from printing even with HP toner cartridges. Some people have gone out buying Brother lasers and just junking the HP gear.

Good on them! Not that it will get HP to change their terrible behavior, but at least you can hurt them in the wallet.

Now, Brother had a bit of trouble last week. News came out that they did a similar DRM move and that people had trouble using non-Brother toner in Brother laser printers, but it was a very small number of printers and never confirmed. I'm not sure what to make of that. We'll see if it's ever confirmed and I shall report on it if it happens. Brother is denying it, whereas HP revels in it.

https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2025/03/firmware-update-bricks-hp-printers-makes-them-unable-to-use-hp-cartridges/
thewayne: (Default)
I'm sure HP will follow suite any moment now.

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! I think I might have peed a little bit there!

With the ongoing world-wide chip shortage that's creeping into everything, it has now crept into the ink jet refill supply chain! I guess Canon has either been getting slammed with support calls or has decided to be preemptive and is telling people that the refills they are now producing will not have chips, like third-party refills that you can buy for much less than the Canon-brand refills. And when you get a warning on "its imageRUNNER large-office printers how to defeat its own protections against cartridges that don’t have chips.

The software on these printers comes with a relatively simple way to defeat the chip checks. Depending on the model, when an error message occurs after inserting toner, users can press either “I Agree,” “Close,” or “OK.” When users press that button, the world does not end. Rather, Canon says users may find that their toner cartridge doesn’t give them a low-toner warning before running empty.

“Although there are no negative effects on print quality when consumables are used without electronic components, certain additional functions, such as the detection of the toner level, may be impaired,” Canon’s support site says.


So don't worry about print quality, just don't be surprised if it runs completely dry without any further warnings. Seems fair.

https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2022/01/chip-shortage-has-canon-telling-customers-how-to-skirt-its-printer-toner-drm/

https://hardware.slashdot.org/story/22/01/10/1959243/chip-shortage-has-canon-telling-customers-how-to-defeat-its-drm
thewayne: (Cyranose)
This is awesome. Guy in Austria built a robot using Lego Mindstorm that presses the Next page on the Kindle, then presses the space bar on his Mac to take a picture of the screen. The image is run through a cloud-based OCR package and a text file is returned.

Totally impractical since you can download software that'll strip the DRM in moments, but still pretty awesome cool.

The creator has a great comment on the Vimeo page quoting Jeff Bezos in an O'Reilly interview talking about people should have the right to share, trade, or sell ebooks, he then turns around and takes that right away from his customers.

http://vimeo.com/73675285

http://allthingsd.com/20130906/how-a-man-in-austria-used-legos-to-hack-amazons-kindle-e-book-security/
thewayne: (Default)
Interesting. Pretty much everyone who has tried DRM has either abandoned it or failed. Not that this won't prevent others from trying it in the future. I was unaware until a few months ago that Apple had stopped applying DRM to iTunes music, apparently they still use it for videos, audiobooks, and apps.

http://opensource.com/life/11/11/drm-graveyard-brief-history-digital-rights-management-music

http://yro.slashdot.org/story/11/11/05/1819243/a-brief-history-of-failed-digital-rights-management-schemes
thewayne: (Default)
There, you can now legally break DRM if you are not violating copyright! So theoretically you could break the encryption on DRM or ebooks for the purpose of backup or using them on other devices. Apparently they also explicitly ban the use of DRM on public domain works!

http://www.boingboing.net/2010/07/10/brazils-copyright-la.html

http://yro.slashdot.org/story/10/07/11/2127246/Brazil-Forbids-DRM-On-the-Public-Domain
thewayne: (Default)
"Cory Doctorow is reporting on a leaked copy of the 'internet enforcement' portion of the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement. He describes it as reading like a 'DMCA-plus' with provisions for third-party liability, digital locks, and 'a duty to technology firms to shut down infringement where they have "actual knowledge" that such is taking place.' For example, this could mean legal responsibility shifting to Apple for customers copying mp3s onto their iPods." Adds an anonymous reader, "Michael Geist points out that the leaks demonstrate that ACTA would create a Global DMCA and move toward a three-strikes-and-you're-out system. While the US has claimed that ACTA won't establish a mandatory three strikes system, it specifically uses three-strikes as its model."

http://yro.slashdot.org/story/10/02/21/2136238/ACTA-Internet-Chapter-Leaked-mdash-Bad-For-Everyone?art_pos=10

I think it's a little much to say bad for everyone. It's Hollywood's wet dream.
thewayne: (Default)
"According to German IT news site heise.de, yesterday several 3D showings of Avatar couldn't take place, because the movies were DRM protected such that there had to be a key per copy of the film, per film projector, and per movie server in the theater. The key supplier, by the name Deluxe, was apparently unable to provide a sufficient number of valid keys in time. Moviegoers were offered to get a refund or view an analogue 2D showing instead."

http://entertainment.slashdot.org/story/09/12/17/1916241/DRM-Flub-Prevented-3D-Showings-of-Avatar-In-Germany?art_pos=22
thewayne: (Default)
I can't imagine how many times that lyric has been, or will be, used to describe the Obama administration.

Among the things that concerned me about the Obama administration was the appointment of former RIAA attorneys into high positions in the Department of Justice. Add to that the fact that Veep Biden is a major friend of Hollywood and has been a proponent of DRM in the past, then this shouldn't be much of a surprise:

Obama DOJ Sides With RIAA
NewYorkCountryLawyer writes "The Obama Administration's Department of Justice, with former RIAA lawyers occupying the 2nd and 3rd highest positions in the department, has shown its colors, intervening on behalf of the RIAA in the case against a Boston University graduate student, SONY BMG Music Entertainment v. Tenenbaum, accused of file sharing when he was 17 years old. Its oversized, 39-page brief (PDF) relies upon a United States Supreme Court decision from 1919 which upheld a statutory damages award, in a case involving overpriced railway tickets, equal to 116 times the actual damages sustained, and a 2007 Circuit Court decision which held that the 1919 decision — rather than the Supreme Court's more recent decisions involving punitive damages — was applicable to an award against a Karaoke CD distributor for 44 times the actual damages. Of course none of the cited cases dealt with the ratios sought by the RIAA: 2,100 to 425,000 times the actual damages for an MP3 file. Interestingly, the Government brief asked the Judge not to rule on the issue at this time, but to wait until after a trial. Also interestingly, although the brief sought to rebut, one by one, each argument that had been made by the defendant in his brief, it totally ignored all of the authorities and arguments that had been made by the Free Software Foundation in its brief. Commentators had been fearing that the Obama/Biden administration would be tools of the RIAA; does this filing confirm those fears?"

http://news.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/03/22/184221
thewayne: (Cyranose)
Wal-Mart orders ALL of its online store music vendors to provide plain MP3s!

The 800 pound gorilla has spoken!

There is an interesting, if somewhat frightening, quote in the article: "Though Wal-Mart maintains a modest 2% market share in the digital download arena, its market share for physical CDs is considerably larger: about 22%, Billboard estimates."

http://blog.wired.com/gadgets/2007/12/wal-mart-kills.html

http://www.billboard.biz/bbbiz/content_display/industry/e3i6efb69eb2243cb842be35f0eab40082d

EDIT: the Slashdot thread hit after I posted this: http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/12/03/235241
thewayne: (Default)
First, Apple reduces the price of music that does not have DRM down to their standard $0.99 that they charge for their ironically-named "Fairply" DRM-enabled music. I'm wondering if this might herald a reduction of their DRM'd music. Regardless, I think it's a good move.

http://blog.wired.com/gadgets/2007/10/itunes-plus-drm.html


Second, Led Zeppelin announces that their music can now be sold digitally. I don't know if Apple will be offering it or not. So as it stands, apparently the only hold-outs for not selling online are The Beatles and Garth Brooks.

http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/10/15/2350211
thewayne: (Default)
A while back, I posted about a huge rant some guy in New Zeeland made about Vista degrading all sorts of things if the DRM is violated, making it sound like the computer basically rolled over and died (well, that is sort of Windows' default fail mode, isn't it? :P ). Unfortunately I can't find said post, I really wish LJ's editing and searching capabilities were stronger. Perhaps if I were to download my blog to a local database....


ANYWAY, this guy (Ed Bott) has written a five page rebuttal (part 1 of 3 or more) called "Everything you've read about Vista DRM is wrong". He picks apart many of the fundamental points from the original screed by Gutmann and methodically demolishes them one by one.

Bott may be right. Certainly sounds correct and supports his assertions, something that Gutmann apparently didn't do well. It still doesn't do much to change my opinion about Vista and Microsoft bending over backwards to please content providers at the cost of stunting the OS. I'm sure SP1 will fix lots of stuff in Vista, hopefully it will be a lot more than just a rollup of all of the patches to date. I'm hoping I won't have to deal with it until at least SP2. :P

I'm quite happy with my MacBook Pro, thenkyewveddymuch.

July 2025

S M T W T F S
   1 2345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 6th, 2025 08:48 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios
OSZAR »