thewayne: (Default)
I told her late last year that it would be a good idea to order a new one because of the probability of serious inflation hitting next year. This was one of the reasons why I got my Asus laptop repaired/replaced. Our Mac laptops should be good for another 5 years or more, we'll see if OS revisions makes them stale before then.

Anyway, had some problems ordering her a new base 16 yesterday, but resolved it this morning and she'll have a new phone sometime Tuesday. We're keeping her 13 Mini as a backup and for international travel in case of border trouble. I replaced my 13 Mini shortly after the 16 released last year as it had a couple of problems that were defying easy diagnosis. Thus far, OS-problems aside, it's been an excellent phone. Takes great photos even though it's not the Pro model.

Apple apparently shipped threefive planes-full of phones from India to the U.S. in three days last weekendmonth to avoid tariffs. And I note that the FedEx shipping confirmation for the new phone has it shipped from California: frequently when I buy big ticket items from Apple, they ship from China. This morning I saw an article that Apple stores were slammed over the weekend with people seeking new equipment before anticipated price hikes.


So. Tariffs and inflation. I'm going to talk about inflation first, in relation to Canada and Mexico since they were the first targets.

What do I think will happen. Well, we're already seeing pain in red states because Canadian businesses are stopping buying from them before last week's launch of the international trade war (including Penguin Island). With Canadian stores clearly labeling Canadian-manufactured products, it was easy for their citizens to avoid buying American products with very little effort on their part. This especially hit the liquor industry, which has lots of manufacturing in the south. Their products are slowly losing shelf space because it's not moving, so that's unsold inventory that is gathering dust. Not only is their revenue down because stores are not buying more product, at some point, stores are going to start wanting refunds on unsold merchandise from distributors.

But that's just sales, which can be a component of inflation. Let's talk about what the tariffs might do to what we see in shelf pricing. Bob and Tom are American manufacturers and they make largely the same product. Bob's source materials are American-made, and cost a little more than Tom's. Tom's source materials are now getting slammed by the tariffs and he has to pay more for his goods. To maintain profits, he has to charge more, so now his goods are a lot more expensive than Bob's. Clearly Bob, who already has decent sales, is going to sell more goods.

But is Bob going to keep the same price? Hell no! He'll raise his price, not as high as Tom's, but there's an opportunity here to make more money! Just like hurricane season and the aftermath when some lumber yards and such raise prices. There's no reason to leave money on the table if consumers must buy the product, as long as he keeps his prices lower than Tom's, who is stuck with the tariff, he's in great shape and everyone else is not only paying Tom's tariff if they buy Tom's because they like Tom, but they're also lining Bob's pocket.

And then there's poor Fred, who gets his source materials from China. He's just flat-out screwed. There's limits to how much you can raise your price and be competitive, and if he lowers his price to close to Tom's or Bob's, he may be losing money, which is no way to run a railroad.

What you'll see is manufacturers directly affected by the tariffs will raise their prices. Maybe not on current stock already made that's in the shipping pipeline, but they'll have to raise it on new stuff being made. And everyone other supplier or manufacturer is going to turn that dial up a couple of notches - not because they have to, but because the public will get used to paying more because they have no choice, and they're doing it because they don't want to leave any money on the table that they can't get ahold of.

That's my take on what we'll see on inflation. There's no way to say how high it will go or how wildly it will vary. But we are in for a wild ride.


Last week's tariffs. The most bat-shit insanity of it is that there was no sound mathematics behind it. It did not take into account the service industry, thus did not accurately reflect any potential trade imbalance. For example, Australia is a net importer of American goods (they have no automobile manufacturing there, etc.) yet were hit with a 10% tariff. There's also that arctic island that has no humans living on it, entirely populated by penguins and such, that has tariffs levied against it. It has been noted that the countries seem to have been selected/targeted by their internet Top Level Domain (.us, .uk, .de, etc). Absolutely non-sensical.

AND, just like when Premier Ford threatened an energy export tax to the USA, the piggie squealed when China threw a 34% tariff against American goods. He tried to hide behind the bluster of 'Big mistake!', but the fact is that he's never been able to handle strong opposition. He expects everyone to kowtow to him, viewing everything as a zero-sum game in which he must always win. Ignore the fact that in international trade, well-executed treaties can have everyone benefiting.

The most curious thing about his relationship with China is that all of the merchandise crap that he hawks is made there! But it's probably all paid out of a slush fund, so he probably never sees the costs and doesn't care as long as his suckers voters continue buying it.

My expectation: the billionaire class, behind the scene, will apply pressure to reverse the tariffs and it'll get done while victory will be declared. Too much money has been wiped from the exchanges for them to be happy with this uncontrolled and turbulent situation, and they're telling the news that they don't like it. "We got what we wanted, everyone is coming to negotiate a fair deal. WE WON! MAGA!"


One last note. I was so amused that his best pal forever, until he throws him under the bus, Leon Ketamine-head, was screaming that the 5 million or so protestors Saturday were all being paid by George Soros. Uh, bud, who was handing out checks in Wisconsin last week?

And Leon was screaming about losing $30 BILLION due to the tariffs. That is, until someone told him to delete his tweets. Which he did.


So there you have it. I'm probably wrong on everything, but that's my take on what's going on and what I expect to happen.


EDIT: to update Apple shipping phones from India. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/technology/mobiles-tabs/how-apple-flew-5-flights-full-of-iphones-from-india-and-china-in-3-days-to-beat-trump-tariffs/articleshow/120044321.cms
thewayne: (Default)
Or any inkjet printer, for that matter. HP just seems especially egregious in their conduct. I have railed against them before, and will continue doing so. Here's the latest.

HP pushed out a firmware update to its printers to disable using non-HP ink cartridges in them. And the update is flawed. It is bricking a number of printers AROUND THE WORLD. They are borked so bad that the touchscreen doesn't respond, and you need a working touchscreen to get into the hardware reset menu! Unless they figure out some way to reverse this, there are going to be A LOT of printers flooding their service centers, or entering landfills.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/money/consumer-affairs/hp-printers-computers-ink-cartridges-rivals/

https://www.engadget.com/hp-officejet-printers-are-bricking-following-a-recent-software-update-223559237.html


This news started spreading about the update early last week, but now news is getting out about printers being turned into cumbersome paperweights.

From a Slashdot summary:
Meanwhile, Engadget now reports that "a software update Hewlett-Packard released earlier this month for its OfficeJet printers is causing some of those devices to become unusable."
After downloading the faulty software, the built-in touchscreen on an affected printer will display a blue screen with the error code 83C0000B. Unfortunately, there appears to be no way for someone to fix a printer broken in this way on their own, partly because factory resetting an HP OfficeJet requires interacting with the printer's touchscreen display. For the moment, HP customers report the only solution to the problem is to send a broken printer back to the company for service.

BleepingComputer says the firmware update "has been bricking HP Office Jet printers worldwide since it was released earlier this month..."
"Our teams are working diligently to address the blue screen error affecting a limited number of HP OfficeJet Pro 9020e printers," HP told BleepingComputer... Since the issues surfaced, multiple threads have been started by people from the U.S., the U.K., Germany, the Netherlands, Australia, Poland, New Zealand, and France who had their printers bricked, some with more than a dozen pages of reports.

"HP has no solution at this time. Hidden service menu is not showing, and the printer is not booting anymore. Only a blue screen," one customer said.

"I talked to HP Customer Service and they told me they don't have a solution to fix this firmware issue, at the moment," another added.


https://hardware.slashdot.org/story/23/05/21/0032211/hp-rushes-to-fix-bricked-printers-after-faulty-firmware-update


The reason why these printers are so inexpensive is because the company - not just HP - makes a fortune on you replacing the ink cartridges. That ink is more expensive than GOLD. It's HP's first or second most profitable line item. The problem is that for most printers, if ANY ink tank empties, the printer won't print until it is replaced. And in multi-function printers with scanners, frequently the SCANNER WON'T WORK if there is an empty ink tank! Where the hell is the logic in that, except to screw over the customers?

I literally threw a multifunction printer in the trash when I couldn't use the scanner. I went out afterwards and bought a nice Epson flat bed scanner for about $200 or so, and it's still in use about a decade later! For printing, I bought a $100 Samsung (sadly now bought out by HP) monochrome laser printer. If I absolutely must print color, I'll do it at work, or for photos, I'll send them to Walgreens and pick them up the next time that I'm in town.

Please PLEASE PLEASE don't buy inkjet printers, unless you absolutely must print color on a regular basis. And if you do need to do that, consider a color laser printer - your cost per page is much less expensive, though the cost of cartridges will cause heart palpitations, at least until you remember how many pages you get out of them.
thewayne: (Default)
Under a cut so you can skip it if you wish.

Read more... )
thewayne: (Default)
Turns out it was reported to Western Digital in 2018. But since the devices were end-of-lifed in '15, they decided not to push an update that would have prevented this happening to their customers.

Nice company.

Here's the even better part.

It's possible the bug lives on in another of their products: "Wizcase [the security researcher who found the flaw] said the flaw it found in MyBook devices also may be present in certain models of WD MyCloud network attached storage (NAS) devices, although Western Digital’s advisory makes no mention of its MyCloud line being affected."

https://krebsonsecurity.com/2021/06/mybook-users-urged-to-unplug-devices-from-internet/


And now for my rant.

This is why I am fundamentally opposed to Internet of Things devices and needlessly connecting things to the internet. Almost all of the companies that make these devices do not do a good job of supporting them and providing security updates because there's no continuing revenue stream: you buy them, or more precisely, once Best Buy or Amazon buys them, there's no continuing money going back to Western Digital or whoever to pay for their programmers to continue updating the software.

Also, these devices use an older, stripped-down version of Linux as their operating system so that it will run on low-powered CPUs. It simplifies programming and lets it run on lower-end CPUs which saves cost. And is more vulnerable to exploits. In this case, the vulnerability was discovered THREE YEARS AGO, and Western Digital was "*MEH*, not our problem. It's the customer's problem if they get stomped on, because they shouldn't be using hardware past its end of life connected to the internet."

How many people buying these devices and connecting them to the internet are security experts?

I'm not raising my hand, because I'm not a security expert. I know more than most non-experts, but I'm not a trained and certified expert. I do know enough not to trust things connected to the internet because they're inherently not trustworthy. The makers have no profit motive to keep them secure, and when it comes to devices like Alexa and such, while they are convenient, they are there to suck marketing information from your life. If you don't mind that, fine. I have no problem turning on lights and my stereo and selecting my own music by myself and I can look at the weather app on my phone to know if it might rain. Yes, I'm a bit of a luddite. I prefer to avoid my devices potentially being compromised.

The mistake people made with these Western Digital devices to access files across the internet was already a solved problem. It's known as SFTP. Western Digital is known for one thing - making hard drives. That's it. People shouldn't rely on them for anything beyond that. If you have a real need to access files remotely, then get a hosting account and/or set up an SFTP server and get your files that way.

A friend of mine did that exact thing when he did remote file installs for a software company, he traveled around the country doing these setups and kept software packages, updates, help scripts, etc on a server in his house that only he could access. Nowdays he could probably carry everything on a bunch of USB flash drives, but not back then.

I think the big question is, do you really need to access all that data remotely, or do you just think it would be cool to be able to? And do you really need two terabytes worth, or could you pare it down to the point that it could fit in Dropbox/OneDrive/iCloud/Googlewhatever? Do you really need instant access to a letter that you wrote twelve years ago cancelling a credit card?


One last thing about backups and the value therein. There are three basic purposes to backups. One is catastrophic recovery: computer theft, hard drive crash, something like that. One is accidental file overwrite, another is file deletion. In the case of deletion, usually you can get it back from the recycle bin, but not always. In the case of overwrite, your only recourse is from backups, those are true OMG! moments. I've done that before. Recovery from backup is only as good as your most recent backup.

But here's the problem: system administrators have a rule of thumb that you don't have a backup until you've tested it by restoring a file from it. And you don't have a safe backup system unless you have at least one copy stored away from your home or business, i.e. off-site. If you're retired, this becomes a little tricky. Me, I have two sets of backup disks. At the start of the month, I take the disk that my iMac currently backs up to into work with me, and it goes into my desk. The disk that's there comes home, and gets plugged in. There's a second disk there that I use to back up our laptops, we currently have three. I refresh those monthly and that disk gets stored in a fire-resistant lockbox that we have here at the house, swapped with its partner at work.

I can inspect those disks with my laptop at work and test them when I have time. And I misspoke, we have four laptops: I also have a Windows laptop that has a slightly different backup routine, but that's another story. I'll talk about Windows backups another time.
thewayne: (Default)
I don't like using a lot of profanity. When you unexpectedly stub your toe or injure yourself, they've proved that using profanity lessens pain. Good. But indiscriminate use of it - I just don't like it and I try to avoid it.

I'd never heard of this actress before, but apparently the rest of the world had judging by the amount of squee emitted.

But this deserves venting.

Thank you, Bored Panda, for providing this, and my rant is under the cut.

Read more... )
thewayne: (Cyranose)
"The reason is quite simple. I have some depth to my ideas."
—Herman Cain, on why he would have a substantial lead if he were running against Barack Obama

I don't think so. But could he beat Romney? I have two fundamental problems with the RNC at the moment, ignoring all the little things like gay rights, women's reproductive rights, etc. Ignoring all of that. Romney keeps saying that he can fix the economy by closing loopholes and cutting taxes. But he won't say what he's gong to do. It's all "Trust me!" with a big smile on his face. 'Elect me and I'll fix everything, but IT'S A BIG SURPRISE! You don't want to have the surprise spoiled for you, do you? Of course not! So put me in the White House!'

I just don't understand how he could think he can run an election without revealing specifics. Ryan was a good pick because he adds a lot of charisma to the campaign, something that Mitt sorely lacks. Mitt is clinically unable to connect with common people, he's utterly lacking in empathy for those beneath his station. Ryan, he has a whole other set of problems, mainly his voting record past. Maybe Mitt's foot-in-mouth disease is contagious and Ryan caught it, or perhaps it's spread through the entire political system.

The second problem that I have with the RNC is they won't admit that for eight years they torpedoed the economy by letting Bush pay for two wars on the country's credit card, and now they stymie any attempt of Obama's to fix it and blame the continued slow growth on him. All traces of working across the aisle have gone away and nothing is going to get done until one party controls both Congress and the Presidency. I don't know if the Republicans in Congress are in denial or just afraid to admit that they're part of the problem, probably some measure of both.

Everyone talks about how Ronald Reagan would be called a RINO these days (Republican In Name Only). They don't talk about, or at least not often, the fact that he raised taxes eight times after cutting them. He had a plan: tax cuts along with spending cuts, and it potentially might have worked. But he got the carrot of tax cuts passed before the stick of spending cuts, and he had real problems that necessitated tax hikes. I am extremely confident that Romney didn't learn that lesson and tax cuts will pass but those pesky tax loopholes won't get closed and we'll go over the cliff with the foot all the way down on the peddle.

Absolutely there are tax loopholes that should be closed. But there are so many of them, and so many people benefit from different loopholes, that it's going to be a heck of a juggling act. Corporate taxes really need to be reformed so that companies like GE, HP, Microsoft, Google, etc., properly pay their taxes here. Just last week HP and Microsoft were slammed in Congress for using tax dodges to reduce their American tax burden. But wait -- doesn't Wall Street and the mechanisms of stocks and being publicly traded mean that the company must maximize shareholder returns? So doesn't minimizing tax burden dovetail nicely with maximized returns? There's a slight ethics problem there.

I am very thankful for that smartphone-owning bartender at Mitt's private fundraiser that documented that 47% gaff. It shows his disconnect and lack of qualification to be President, and shows the general public what his real opinions are.

Jon Huntsman repeatedly stressed that banks should be broken up, they fought for decades to defeat the Glass-Stegal Act and finally won, and now look where we are. The banks are so deeply tied in to the government that if the banks succeed at some risky venture, they win. If they fail at said risky venture, they get bailed out and the taxpayers lose. That is an incredibly sweet deal. And it's the absolute text-book definition of capitalism and market Darwinism where the failures get winnowed-out of the business gene pool. [/sarcasm]

I don't think a majority of Americans realize how deeply screwed this country is.


One last thing that I found quite interesting. There's a recent article in New york Magazine by Frank Rich called My Embed In Red. He spent a week getting all of his news from Republican news sources: Fox News, Rush, Savage, etc. And he did it during the RNC convention. And he noticed a big disconnect between Republicans at large and the coalition of Fox News and Romney's campaign. And I use the word coalition unreservedly: many of Romney's top people are also paid Fox employees. A lot of people don't think that Romney/Fox represent their viewpoints. They don't like Obama, but they also feel that their views were excluded from the RNC convention. Look at what the convention did to Ron Paul, then think about all the votes that he got. It looks like Romney is representing a minority of the Republican party, but because of Citizen's United, they have such a loud voice because of their money that the rest of the Republicans are being ignored. It's going to be interesting to see how many Republicans don't vote for Romney. Everyone says that the election boils down to the eight swing states, and that all the other states are locked for one candidate or the other. But what if enough Republicans are feeling disenfranchised enough to not vote for Romney that some of these states flip? Currently enough of those swing states are polling for Obama that Romney has lost the election, but we're still over a month out, so that could change. I think if Obama plays a conservative (as opposed to risky) strategy, he has it sewn up.


One last comment for this ridiculously-long blather. We didn't get to see the two party's conventions or highlights because we've been quasi-homeless for the last month: lightning struck a tree behind our house and drove a 25' chunk of pine through our roof, so we missed it. But one comment that I've heard is that based on the televised coverage of the conventions, the RNC was a white-washed meeting whereas the Democratic convention actually looked like a representation of the racial makeup of America. Non-Caucasian people are the reality of America, politicians had better get it through their heads. I lived in a city that Caucasians were a minority, and I have to say that overall, it was a nicer, more pleasant, place than the Caucasian-majority places that I've been.
thewayne: (Default)
I went in to Kmart this afternoon looking for a kazoo. They had Halloween decorations out. I've got no problem with that.

They also had Christmas trees out. Not quite 90 days away from the holiday. It should be against the law to put out decorations more than 45 days in advance of a holiday.

Just sayin'.


(and no, no kazoo. *sigh*)
thewayne: (Default)
"They did not tell me that you were going to grill me for this specific information that I was not ready to give to you tonight."
-- TX Rep. Debbie Riddle, upset with Anderson Cooper for pressing her on the claim that "terror babies" exist

"Badges? We ain't got no badges. We don't need no badges. I don't have to show you any stinking badges."

The New Colossus

Not like the brazen giant of Greek fame,
With conquering limbs astride from land to land;
Here at our sea-washed, sunset gates shall stand
A mighty woman with a torch, whose flame
Is the imprisoned lightning, and her name
Mother of Exiles. From her beacon-hand
Glows world-wide welcome; her mild eyes command
The air-bridged harbor that twin cities frame.
"Keep, ancient lands, your storied pomp!" cries she
With silent lips. "Give me your tired, your poor,
Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,
The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.
Send these, the homeless, tempest-tost to me,
I lift my lamp beside the golden door!"

Emma Lazarus, 1883


I have lived my entire life within 100 miles of Mexico, mostly living in Phoenix, AZ. White Americans people were the minority in my condo complex: the dominant group were Bosnian. White Americans are the minority in Las Cruces where I lived for over 2 years. While I'm not a fan of illegal immigration, pretty much no one talks about improving conditions south of our border to reduce the desire for people to head Norte. It's all about kicking 'em out and sealing the border, an impossible task.

OK, so I'm a little off-topic and we're really alleging that pregnant terrorist supporters are trying to get babies born in the US so they become citizens and can travel more freely. I just occasionally need to rant about immigration.

Do "terror babies" exist? I can't really see AQ launching a 20+ year campaign to do something like that. The logistics are incredibly difficult. Russia recently pulled off something like this in terms of information gathering (of dubious success), but that's not sabotage, assassination and terrorism. Plus, the terrorist training camps are pretty closely monitored and the CIA knows a lot of who is getting trained there, and we all well know that being an American won't keep you off the watch lists and the no fly lists.
thewayne: (Default)
ALGEBRA HAS NOT FUNDAMENTALLY FUCKING CHANGED IN A VERY LONG TIME!

SO WHY ARE THE BLOODY BOOKS FOR A REMEDIAL CLASS OVER $100?!


I took a class in the Fall of '08, my carpal tunnel problem decided to make my life hell, and I had to drop the class. I'd like to re-take the class. But, of course, now they're using a different book and it'll cost me something like $130 for a used copy, assuming they have any.

Which is about what I paid for the fucking book in '08.

On top of that, YOU CAN'T BUY THE BOOK USED ONLINE AT HALF.COM OR OTHER RESOURCES! Why? Because there's a 20 page supplement in the back written by NMSU teachers, making it an NMSU edition.

Bastards.


Last week I came across an article about Scott McNealy, the former head of the former computer hardware and software corporation known as Sun (gobbled up by Oracle). He's fed up also and is starting a foundation to develop open source/Creative Commons versions of college textbooks.

GO, SCOTT! I LOVE YOU! I WILL BEAR YOU MANY STRONG MAN CHILDS! (a line specially for the slash fans that may be lurking amongst you, sorry, but it's a joke and I'm straight)

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/01/technology/01ping.html

http://news.slashdot.org/story/10/08/02/222200/Sun-Founders-Push-For-Open-Source-Education

Man, I really hope he succeeds. It just really pisses me off that these books are so expensive for subject matter that should have been refined to the point of perfection, but they're far from perfect!


Reading the comments on Slashdot, I came across a link to an article written by the amazing physicist Richard Feynman. He served on the California board for textbook review and selection. The problem is, he actually read, cover-to-cover, the math books he was supposed to review. He didn't meet with the publishers or attend their presentations, he didn't go to dinners with them, he didn't accept their presents. And he found that all of the math books that he reviewed were uniformly crap. He also learned that they were overpriced because the publishers usually did not have to bid competitively against each other.

One of the most beautiful parts was regarding a set of three books. Feynman didn't review the third because he didn't receive a copy to evaluate. He said the other two were fine, so he assumed the third would be OK. Six of the ten reviewers had reviewed the third book. It turns out that the book had not been completed by the deadline, so the publisher sent blank pages bound in the book's cover. Blank books. Six people reviewed a blank book with good marks.

http://www.textbookleague.org/103feyn.htm


Yet another comment led me to a South African project called Free High School Science Texts. They have grades 10-12 free books on chemistry, physics, and mathematics in LaTeX format.

http://www.fhsst.org/


The basic problem, as outlined at the end of the Feynman page, is that school boards are totally in the pockets of publishers and seem to care less that the students are getting financially raped every semester. A good computer book, which is frequently outdated in 2-4 years, usually doesn't cost more than $60 or so. That's half the cost of a remedial algebra book. That's 2/3rds the cost of an introduction to nutrition book.

Some fields change rapidly. They revise information in astronomy it seems daily. BUT THE FOUNDATIONS DON'T CHANGE RAPIDLY. I can understand upper level course books being expensive, lower level books SHOULD NOT. They're exploiting a market because so many people don't go past an Associates degree.


It just makes me sick.

[end rant]


On a totally different note: man, I wish I could have studied under Feynman. He died in '88, I didn't learn about him until after his death. The dude was absolutely brilliant, and sounds like he was tremendously funny.

July 2025

S M T W T F S
   1 2345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 6th, 2025 10:24 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios
OSZAR »